Saturday, March 25, 2017

Existentialist: Part I & II

Part I...
Freedom of choice, well there's no such thing as that, not really. Sure, you can chose to get up in the morning and make yourself breakfast, etc., but once you hit that door the outside world is not yours entirely. We have limited choice and we are like mice in a maze, looking for the cheese. We MUST have a purpose, that is what we call survival.

We are not given the choice to being born or even who our parents our. Although, I'm lucky on that cause I have a loving and supportive mother whom I love unconditionally. Most are not so lucky, which shakes me to the core. Yes, we are being taught by someone else and their ways, rules and laws. We can chose to abide by them or not but, there are consequences, and these consequences yet again are from someone else. I feel like there's a form or mold that ALL humans MUST be fit for. For example, your either far to the left or far to the right. There's never a happy medium for anyone, because it's just not natural in the eyes of the world.  Hogwash, I say.  Say, is all I can put out there for the moment, because I know sure as anything someone will challenge it. I'm speaking hogwash for myself, I control myself alone, on certain issues, etc.  Everyone's different on certain things but, yes its true we are all molded one way to do one thing and that is to survive, however we do it, we ALL have to survive. Like I said about the maze, in that big scary place we call the world, you have the choice to live or die.

You can either be lead like cattle to slaughter with no place to go, except to the end of the line OR you can be like those suicide ants going around in a circle until someone places a finger in the middle to help you break free. The choice is yours.


.  

Part II...
Now, I'm to Imagine??? Mmmm... I really don't have to imagine that existential hero. People have always had that perception about me anyways. Why?  Maybe its because I don't have any friends, or maybe because I am quiet and sometime to myself.  I just scope out the lay of the land sort of speak and little by little find my way out there.  I'm just myself and being me. Sure things are not always easy but, it's working for me. I'm doing it the hard way for a reason and learning the experiences but, it will make for a harder shell to crack and I'm stronger because of that. It'll all come out good in the end, hard work will prevail they say and I believe that.   


Sunday, March 12, 2017

Short Analysis of Advertising

(Puppy Love, Budweiser-2014 Super Bowl)


I normally look forward to the ads during the Super Bowl. They are a mixture of all emotions and usually the things we really want to say/feel and the ads really do speak for themselves. The reason why I chose this ad specifically, one it's very touching and close to my heart. I love puppies!  Also, I remember a time when I saw the Clydesdale's at Sea World, when they kept them there in the late 90's. They are amazing to see in person, such beautiful creatures. So this ad brought that to mind. Secondly, it made for a better Super Bowl Sunday watching this ad because this particular game was so boring and such a blowout, which made me lose interest very quickly. So, the ad more than made up the rather gloomy game, into a joyous ending. As you watch the ad from the link provided you will understand completely my meaning for which I have explained.  



Budweiser's heartwarming 2014 Super Bowl commercial (in which a puppy befriends a horse) has been ranked the most popular ad ever to air in the 50-year history of the NFL's premier event, according to a study from TiVo. That's largely because the company took the time to develop a plot line. The beer company's 90-second "Puppy Love" commercial does more than depict the friendship between two (adorable) furry animals. As the puppy repeatedly attempts to escape the kennel and find the Clydesdale, a relationship also develops between the kennel owner and the horse-keeper. The ad culminates when horses bar the puppy from leaving in a car, and the humans consent to let them play together in peace.

Friday, March 3, 2017

A Farewell to Arms

 by Ernest Hemingway


ABOUT THE BOOK

A Farewell to Arms is a novel by Ernest Hemingway set during the Italian campaign of World War I. The book, published in 1929, is a first-person account of American Frederic Henry, serving as a Lieutenant ("Tenente") in the ambulance corps of the Italian Army. The title is taken from a poem by 16th-century English dramatist George Peele. A Farewell to Arms is about a love affair between the expatriate American Henry and Catherine Barkley against the backdrop of the First World War, cynical soldiers, fighting and the displacement of populations. The publication of A Farewell to Arms cemented Hemingway's stature as a modern American writer, this became his first best-seller and is described by biographer Michael Reynolds as "the premier American war novel from that debacle World War I.

THEMES PERTAINING TO THE BOOK

THE GRIM REALITY OF WAR
As the title of the novel makes clear, A Goodbye to Arms concerns itself mostly with war, namely the process by which Frederic Henry removes himself from it and leaves it behind. The novel offers excellently-done descriptions of the conflicts and confusion: the scene of the Italian army's retreat remains one of the most deeply extreme memories of war in American books. Henry's shooting of the engineer for refusing to help free the car from the mud shocks: first, the violent outburst seems fighting with Henry's coolly detached character; second, the event happens in a setting that robs it of its moral import--the involvement with the crime of Henry's fellow soldiers justify the killing. Anyway, the novel cannot be said to strongly criticize the war; Instead, the innocent engineer's death is the unavoidable result of the cruelty of war. Hemingway hints that war is nothing more than the dark, murderous extension of a world that refuses to admit to, protect, or preserve true love.

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LOVE AND PAIN
Against the background of war, Hemingway offers a sadly deep thinking about the nature of love. No sooner does Catherine announce to Henry that she is in suffering for her dead fiancé than she begins a game meant to flirt with Henry. Also, Henry intends to get as far away from talk of the war as possible. In each other, Henry and Catherine find comfort from the things that badly bother them. Henry's understanding of how meaningful his love for Catherine is outweighs any forethought for the emptiness of fuzzy ideals such as honor, enabling him to run from the war and look for her. Reunited, they plan a peaceful life together that promises to act as a skin medicine for the damage that the war has caused. The terrible event of the novel rests in the fact that their love, can never be more than temporary in this world.

MASCULINITY
Readers of Hemingway's fiction will quickly see a consistent thread in the representation and celebration of a certain kind of man: bossy, extremely extraordinary and proud. Rinaldi is a faithful friend and an oversexed man, who loves to flirt with women; Dr. Valentini shows a masculinity to rival Rinaldi's as well as a bold smart ability that makes him the best doctor. During the scene in which Henry fires his pistol at the running engineering sergeants, Bonello takes charge of the situation by harshly shooting the fallen engineer in the head. The respect with which Hemingway sketches these men, even at their lowest points, is highlighted by the humor, if not contempt, with which he shows their opposites.

GAMES AND DIVERTISEMENT
Henry and Catherine begin flirting with each other to forget personal troubles. Flirting, which Henry compares to bridge, allows Henry to "drop the war" and focus on something else like Catherine's thoughts from the death of her fiancĂ©. Also, the horse races that Catherine and Henry attend enable them to block out thinking of Henry's return to the front and of their happening soon separation. Henry and Catherine's relationship becomes the source of suffering from which Henry needs diversion. Henry cannot stand to be away from Catherine, and while playing pool with Count Greffi takes his mind off of her, the best entertainment turns out to be the war itself. When Catherine instructs him not to think about her when they are apart, Henry replies, "That's how I worked it at the front”. The changes of the war from deadly threat into entertainment and love tampers not only Henry's attachment to Catherine but, also the short-lived nature of happiness.

LOYALTY VERSUS ABANDONMENT
The ideas of loyalty and being alone apply equally well to love and war. Then overall, however, hints that loyalty is more a needed thing of love and friendship than of the grand political causes and ideas of fighting nations. Although he shoots an uncooperative engineering sergeant for failing to obey his orders, Henry's violence should be read as an unavoidable result of a destructive war rather than as a serious and well-thought-out decision to enforce a code of moral behavior. While he does, at times, feel guilt over this course of action, he takes comfort in the knowledge that he is most loyal where loyalty counts most: in his relationship with Catherine. That these disagreeing loyalties cannot be reached does not suggest, however, that loyalty and being left alone lie at opposite ends of a moral spectrum.

ILLUSIONS AND FANTASIES
Upon meeting, Catherine and Henry rely upon a grand fake image of love and leading someone away from what's right, usually for sex for comfort. At first, their love is clear and honest: Catherine reminds Henry at times that their early stages of the relationship are a game, sending him away when she has played her fill. After Henry is wounded, however, his desire for Catherine and the comfort and support that she offers becomes more than an object or action from the world's unpleasantness. While the couple acts in ways that confirm the honest nature of their passion, however, they never escape the desire of dreaming of a better world. Boredom has begun to set in, and the couple effects small daily changes to give new life to their lives and their passion: Catherine gets a new haircut, while Henry grows a beard. They dream of life on a Swiss mountain, where they will make their own clothes and need nothing but each other, suggesting that fantasizing is part of successfully dealing with the dull, sometimes damaging effects of reality.

BANNED, CENSORED OR CHALLENGED
  • Challenged in NY (Vernon-Verona-Sherill School District) as a “sex novel.” (1980) and in Texas (Dallas Independent School District) (1974). Also, challenged in 1987 at the Baptist College in Charleston, SC due to “language and sexual references in the book.”
  • Banned in Italy (1929) apparently due to the description of the retreat from Caporetto. Also, banned in Ireland (1939) and in Boston (1929) for politics, sex, and language.
  • Burned in Germany (1933) …by Nazis.  For “being a monument of modern decadence.”

PERSONAL REFLECTION

In high school, I saw the movie with Gary Cooper and you know how the movie is always different from the book. I decided to read the book to look for any differences.  Naturally the language and sex themes, which in the movie, was toned down because of the viewing audience at the time. I liked the movie because it suited my tastes, considering that time frame (1930’s).


WORK CITED

"A Farewell to Arms." SparkNotes. SparkNotes, n.d. Web. 03 Mar. 2017.
"Banned Book Club: A Farewell to Arms." Graphing Wonderland. N.p., 01 July 2013. Web. 03 Mar. 2017
Harris, Heather. "Ernest Hemingway." Ernest Hemingway. N.p., 01 Jan. 1970. Web. 03 Mar. 2017.